Did the Rolling Stones and Beatles get along?

“We went through some pretty strange times,” Mick Jagger shared while inducting the Beatles into the Rock And Roll Hall of Fame in 1988. “We had a sort of — a lot of rivalry in those early years, and a little bit of friction, but we always ended up friends.

What was the relationship between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones?

The supposed rivalry between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones was, by most accounts, largely fictional — cooked up by the media as a way of pitting the two legendary groups against each other, riling up their fanbases and stoking album sales. In actuality, the two bands were friendly.

What did paul McCartney say about The Rolling Stones recently?

McCartney called The Rolling Stones a “cover band” in a new interview. Speaking to The New Yorker writer David Remnick, McCartney was clear about who he thinks is the more artistically adventurous band. “I’m not sure I should say it, but they’re a blues cover band. That’s sort of what the Stones are,” he said.

Who sold more records the Beatles or the Stones?

	ARTIST	COMBINED SALES TOTAL
1	BEATLES	22.1 MILLION
2	QUEEN	12.8 MILLION
3	ABBA	11.3 MILLION
4	ROLLING STONES	10.1 MILLION

What did Mick Jagger say about John Lennon’s death?

Yet, after John’s tragic assassination in 1980, Sir Mick commemorated the star with a tribute, recalled by the Scotsman in 2005. “I liked John a lot. He was the one I really got on with the most. We weren’t buddy-buddies but we were always friendly.

What did Mick Jagger say about McCartney?

Whereas we had a little more influences. There’s a lot of differences.” He added: “I love the Stones, but I’m with you. The Beatles were better.” Jagger, who described McCartney as “a sweetheart,” responded by saying: “There’s obviously no competition!” before continuing: “The big difference…

Who is the best rock band ever?

The 10 best rock bands ever

• The Beatles. The Beatles are unquestionably the best and most important band in rock history, as well as the most compelling story.
• Beatlemania redux.
• The Rolling Stones.
• U2.
• The Grateful Dead.
• Velvet Underground.
• Led Zeppelin.
• Ramones.

What is the difference between the Rolling Stones and the Beatles?

The Rolling Stones arrived on the scene around the same time the Beatles did. At first, the Stones tried out the clean cut look but soon found that it was not for them. They quickly adopted a much rougher, quirkier image than the Beatles. America fell for the Stones, as well.

How many groups have the Beatles influenced?

So it’s no surprise The Beatles have more than twice as many groups listed among those they “influenced,” either “directly” or substantively, as The Rolling Stones: 211, according to AllMusic, to the Stones’ 87. Let’s more closely examine the top 10 for each.

Do you prefer the Beatles or the stones?

Even if you prefer one over the other, you have to admit that both of these bands are iconic. There are some, however, who argue that the Beatles are better because they were pioneers in much of the musical advances of the ’60s and that the Stones simply used what the Beatles pioneered.

How would you describe the Beatles in real life?

John McMillian, author of the forthcoming Beatles vs. Stones from Simon & Schuster, describes the encounter. Everybody knows how adorably goofy and good-natured the Beatles could come across in their radio and television interviews, especially during the first flush of Beatlemania. In real life, however, they often struck people differently.