Can an individual legitimately disobey the law in a democracy like protesting )?

A good democrat may dis- agree with the laws of his country but will never carry that dis- agreement to open disobedience. Nonetheless, it is safe to say that civil disobedience involves the public violation of the law of a government recognized as legitimate by the disobedient.

Is it ever right to disobey the law?

In short, if anybody ever has a right to break the law, this cannot be a legal right under the law. It has to be a moral right against the law. And this moral right is not an unlimited right to disobey any law which one regards as unjust.

Is civil disobedience justified in a democracy?

Civil disobedience in a democracy is not morally justified because it poses an unacceptable threat to the rule of law. In a democracy, minority groups have basic rights and alternatives to civil disobedience. as freedoms of speech, press, association, and religion.

What is it called when you disobey the government?

civil disobedience, also called passive resistance, the refusal to obey the demands or commands of a government or occupying power, without resorting to violence or active measures of opposition; its usual purpose is to force concessions from the government or occupying power.

Who said if a law is unjust A man is not only right to disobey it he is obligated to do so?

Thomas Jefferson
If a law is unjust a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. — Thomas Jefferson.

What term referred to the nonviolent refusal to obey a law in an attempt to call attention to government policy that is considered unfair?

civil disobedience. -A nonviolent, public refusal to obey allegedly unjust laws.

Who argued that individuals should not disobey law but instead work within the existing political and legal systems to change law?

ACCORDING to liberal political the- ory, as first formulated by John Locke, any individual citizen, oppressed by the rulers of the state, has a right to disobey their commands, break their laws, even rebel and seek to replace the rulers and change the laws.

What are some examples of unjust laws in the United States today?

Money Bail.

Private Bail Companies.

Suspended Drivers Licenses.

Excessive Mandatory Minimum Sentences.

Wealth-Based Banishment That Outlaws Low-Income Housing.

Private Probation Abuses.

Parking Tickets to Debtors’ Prison.

Sex Offense Registration Laws.

What does civil disobedience in a democracy is morally justified mean?

Civil disobedience is always justified by the people participating in the disobeying for the simple reason that they will always believe in what they are doing. However, from an outside perspective, the justifications are analyzed through the values of the individual, organization or government.

When can civil disobedience be justified?

Many types of objections to civil disobedience have been raised, often based on the view that citizens in a democracy are obliged to obey the law. However, none of these objections are decisive against every act of civil justification. Thus, civil disobedience may be morally justified, even in a democracy.

What is considered civil disobedience?

Civil disobedience can be defined as refusing to obey a law, a regulation or a power judged unjust in a peaceful manner. Civil disobedience is, therefore, a form of resistance without violence.

Is disobedience to the law necessary in a despotic regime?

IT is possible, however, to take a mucn more moderate and plausible version of this position, and many quite reasonable people do. Such people concede that disobedience to the law can sometimes be legitimate and necessary under a despotic regime.

Can civil disobedience ever be justified?

THE basic fallacy in the proposition that, in a democracy, civil disobedience can never be justified, is that it confuses the ideals or aims of democracy with the inevitably less than perfect accomplishments of democracy at any given moment.

Is there a stronger case for obedience to the law in democracy?

Now it is perfectly true, I believe, that there is a stronger case for obedience to the law, including bad law, in a democracy than in a dictatorship. The people who must abide by the law have presumably been consulted, and they have legal channels through which to express their protests and to work for reform.

What are the rights and powers of a democracy?

In accordance with democratic ideals, the laws of a democracy may give rights and powers to individuals which, in theory, enable them to work legally for the elimination of injustices. In actual fact, however, these rights and powers may be empty.