Could the Milgram experiment be replicated today?

Social psychologists from SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Poland replicated a modern version of the Milgram experiment and found results similar to studies conducted 50 years earlier. While no shocks were actually delivered in any of the experiments, the participants believed them to be real.

Are there any ethical issues with the study that Stanley Milgram carried out?

The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.

What did you learn from the Milgram obedience study that applies to real life?

The Milgram experiment, and the replications and related experiments that followed it, showed that contrary to expectations, most people will obey an order given by an authority figure to harm someone, even if they feel that it’s wrong, and even if they want to stop.

When Burger replicated Milgram’s obedience studies with modern ethical procedures in place what difference did he find in rates of obedience to authority?

In Burger’s replication, 70 percent of the participants had to be stopped as they continued past 150 volts – a difference that was not statistically significant. “Nearly four out of five of Milgram’s participants who continued after 150 volts went all the way to the end of the shock generator,” Burger said.

When the Milgram experiment was recreated the findings suggest?

Milgram found that, after hearing the learner’s first cries of pain at 150 volts, 82.5 percent of participants continued administering shocks; of those, 79 percent continued to the shock generator’s end, at 450 volts.

What ethical guidelines did Milgram break?

Milgram’s study has been heavily criticised for breaking numerous ethical guidelines, including: deception, right to withdraw and protection from harm.

What did Stanley Milgram’s experiment demonstrate?

The Milgram experiment(s) on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram. The experiment found, unexpectedly, that a very high proportion of subjects would fully obey the instructions, albeit reluctantly.

When Burger replicated the Milgram obedience Study in 2009 what did he discover about the new obedience rates?

Which measures are in place today to help ensure research is conducted ethically?

In order to minimising the risk of harm you should think about:

• Obtaining informed consent from participants.
• Protecting the anonymity and confidentiality of participants.
• Avoiding deceptive practices when designing your research.
• Providing participants with the right to withdraw from your research at any time.

What did Milgram’s obedience experiment prove?

What were the results of the Milgram experiment?

Results: 65\% (two-thirds) of participants (i.e., teachers) continued to the highest level of 450 volts. All the participants continued to 300 volts. Milgram did more than one experiment – he carried out 18 variations of his study.

What are the Milgram Experiment ethical issues?

What are the Milgram Experiment Ethical Issues? The Milgram Experiment was a series of experimental studies that took place in the 1960s to investigate how willing subjects were to obey an authority figure even when their actions directly conflicted with their personal conscience.

What were Stanley Milgram’s shocking experiments?

More than fifty years ago, then Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted the famous—or infamous—experiments on destructive obedience that have come to be known as “Milgram’s shocking experiments” (pun usually intended). Milgram began his experiments in July 1961,…

Does Milgram’s research differ between men and women?

And, like Milgram, he found no difference in the rates of obedience between men and women. “People learning about Milgram’s work often wonder whether results would be any different today,” Burger says. “Many point to the lessons of the Holocaust and argue that there is greater societal awareness of the dangers of blind obedience.

Was Milgram’s experiment on Eichmann similar to the Holocaust?

The early experiments were conducted in the shadow of the Adolf Eichmann Nazi war crimes trial and there were many uncomfortable parallels drawn between Milgram’s results and the blind obedience exhibited by thousands of Nazi accomplices during the Holocaust.