Is it good to read book summaries?

With book summary apps, the reading experience becomes touch-and-go; useful for learning about big ideas, but not as useful for deep reading. Quickly digesting many different books can cause ideas to blur together in your mind.

Is reading a summary the same as reading a book?

Reading summary will be the same as reading a headline of an in-depth article. That might be good for a lot of articles but in the meanwhile, you will miss the good ones. Even if someone made a good summary, it is that person’s point of view or take away’s from that book.

What are harms of not reading?

Academic, emotional and social issues abound for children who are poor readers. Children who are behind their peers in reading struggle with low self-esteem and feelings of inadequacy. Low achievement in reading is also the common denominator in school discipline, attendance and dropout problems, and juvenile crime.

What are the disadvantages of reading a summary?

Cons of reading book summaries You cannot judge a book by its cover or by its summary. Summaries of books might be covering important points. But they may not essentially cover all the important points, page by page.

Is it better to read a summary than a full book?

The marginal value of reading an extra book doesn’t diminish quickly. If a higher concentration of value can be obtained by reading a summary than a full book, it will always make more sense to keep reading summaries. The internal consistency of this book-reading strategy seems to make sense to me.

Is it bad to read only the summaries?

But if that’s the case, reading only the summaries doesn’t sound like a bad idea. Here’s the argument: Books, like most things, have unevenly distributed ideas and value. The thesis of a major argument is worth comparitively more than smaller arguments. A summary gives the main thesis and necessary evidence without going into as much detail.

Is it worth it to read more than one book?

Nobody will read even a fraction of all books, possibly not even a sizeable percentage of truly great books. The marginal value of reading an extra book doesn’t diminish quickly. If a higher concentration of value can be obtained by reading a summary than a full book, it will always make more sense to keep reading summaries.

Why do people read so many hard books?

The Hansonian version of me sees the clearest reason for this divergence is that reading long, hard books is something few people would do (or enjoy). Therefore, you can signal your erudition by reading lots of deep, hard books, even if you end up sacrificing sheer volume of ideas.