Is Krishna real story?

Pandit, as the sutradhar of the documentary Krishna: History or Myth?, uses four pillars — archaeology, linguistics, what he calls the living tradition of India and astronomy to arrive at the circumstantial verdict that Krishna was indeed a living being, because Mahabharata and the battle of Kurukshetra indeed …

Is Krishna a historical figure?

Krishna was both a historical person and a mythological character. There have been many persons having the same name Krishna but only one Krishna who has been idolized using the literary medium or form called mythology. The popular image with which he is associated is a crafted one.

Did Mahabharata really happen?

But in India, as the pilgrimage to Kurukshetra for the eclipse indicates, the Mahabharata is a living text that permeates contemporary thought and spirit. Its events may have occurred 5,000 or 3,000 years ago. It was probably first written down some 2,000 years ago or a little earlier.

Is Buddha really an avatar of Vishnu?

In the Vaishnavite sect of Hinduism, the historic Buddha or Gautama Buddha, is the ninth avatar among the ten major avatars of the god Vishnu. In contemporary Hinduism the Buddha is revered by Hindus who usually consider “Buddhism to be another form of Hinduism”.

Did Krishna and Rama exist as real human beings?

Yes, Krishna and Rama existed as real human beings. If you remove all the layers of Bhakti and supernatural miracles attributed to them in later centuries, you will find that their descriptions in Mahabharata and Ramayana are quite ordinary.

Is it true that people take my opinion on Radha and Krishna?

Yes, it is true that I have read almost all prominent books and articles on Radha and Krishna and people definitely take my opinion seriously. I may not be right all the time. If you have any cross questions and answers, you can start a conversation through comment section. Now without wasting your time I want to start the questions answers series.

What are some mind-blowing facts about Krishna?

Krishna’s good looks are the matter of folklore, but though commonly depicted in paintings and idols as blue, his skin colour was actually dark. Spiritualists believe that his all-inclusive, magnetic aura had blue hues and so he is generally depicted as being blue in colour. 5. Krishna brought his Guru Sandipani Muni’s dead son back to life.

Was Rama a real historical figure?

Many historians doubt that Rama was an actual person, however, many Hindus believe he was a real historical figure and argue that there is enough circumstantial evidence to suggest that the legends about Rama, although written in a fanciful way, may have been based on real events.