Is Pascals Wager persuasive?

Pascal’s Wager. Abstract: Since Pascal does not think a sound argument can be given for God’s existence, he proposes a persuasive consideration.

What are some good objections that can be constructed to the wager?

Two main objections are often raised to Pascal’s Wager.

(1) To believe in God simply for the payoff is the wrong motive for belief.

(2) In order to be sure of a payoff, an individual would not know which God or gods to believe in to cover the conditions of the wager.

Is Pascals Wager a good argument?

Blaise Pascal’s infamous “wager” doesn’t get a lot of credit for being a rigorous philosophical argument for the existence of God, and with good reason. It is not a rigorous philosophical argument for the existence of God; nor is it meant to be. If you don’t believe in God, and you’re right, you die and nothing happens.

Why Pascals Wager is wrong?

Pascal’s logic is also flawed because belief in God does not always guarantee infinite joys and grace. According to the bible, the believers must strictly follow His words to enter heaven. That is, developing a fragile faith and not practicing the words of God could also lead to punishments after death.

What is Pascal’s wager?

Pascal’s wager is a philosophical argument presented by the seventeenth-century French philosopher, theologian, mathematician, and physicist, Blaise Pascal (1623–1662). It posits that human beings wager with their lives that God either exists or does not.

Is Pascal’s wager good?

Overall, Pascal’s Wager feels great to play despite its quirks. The combat is great and more than makes up for the graphical flaws and dubious voice acting, the character swapping mechanic is new and interesting, and it is delightfully dark.

What is Pascal’s wager argument?

Pascal’s wager, practical argument for belief in God formulated by French mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal. He argued that people can choose to believe in God or can choose to not believe in God, and that God either exists or he does not.

What is Pascal’s wager in philosophy?

Pascal’s Wager. First published Sat May 2, 1998; substantive revision Fri Sep 1, 2017. “Pascal’s Wager” is the name given to an argument due to Blaise Pascal for believing, or for at least taking steps to believe, in God.

What did Voltaire think of Pascal’s wager?

Voltaire (another prominent French writer of the Enlightenment), a generation after Pascal, rejected the idea that the wager was “proof of God” as “indecent and childish”, adding, “the interest I have to believe a thing is no proof that such a thing exists”.

What is the wager in Pensées?

The wager uses the following logic (excerpts from Pensées, part III, §233): God is, or God is not. A Game is being played… You must wager (it is not optional) Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. But some cannot believe.

What are the counterarguments to the wager?

The wager is commonly criticised with counterarguments such as the failure to prove the existence of God, the argument from inconsistent revelations, and the argument from inauthentic belief. This section needs additional citations for verification.