What does Marx say about the end of history?

For Marx the end of history is also freedom. But not the philosophical freedom that Hegel described, it is an economic freedom. The end of the exploitation of man by man. Marx predicted that the next step in history was when the proletariat gets control of the means of production and he called this new stage Socialism.

What is the end of history according to Fukuyama?

In October 2001, Fukuyama, in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece, responded to criticism of his thesis after the September 11 attacks and supported his views by saying, “I believe that in the end I remain right…” He further explained that what he meant by “End of History” was the evolution of human political system.

What is the purpose of history Hegel?

For Hegel, the purpose or goal of history is the progress of the consciousness of freedom. Progress is rational in so far as it corresponds to this development. This rational development is the evolution of Geist attaining consciousness of itself, since the very nature of spirit is freedom.

How does history change over time according to Karl Marx?

Marx held that the only unchanging law is that everything changes. This being so, cumulative changes have led to wholesale transformations, so that human history appears as a succession of separate “social formations”.

What is meant by the end of history?

The end of history is a political and philosophical concept that supposes that a particular political, economic, or social system may develop that would constitute the end-point of humanity’s sociocultural evolution and the final form of human government.

What is postmodernism in history?

postmodernism, also spelled post-modernism, in Western philosophy, a late 20th-century movement characterized by broad skepticism, subjectivism, or relativism; a general suspicion of reason; and an acute sensitivity to the role of ideology in asserting and maintaining political and economic power.

When did Fukuyama write The End of History?

The End of History and the Last Man is a 1992 book of political philosophy by American political scientist Francis Fukuyama which argues that with the ascendancy of Western liberal democracy—which occurred after the Cold War (1945–1991) and the dissolution of the Soviet Union (1991)—humanity has reached “not just …

Who coined the term “end of history?

A name that is commonly linked to the concept of the end of history in contemporary discourse is Francis Fukuyama. Fukuyama brought the term back to the forefront with his essay The End of History? that was published months before the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.

How will history end?

On the individual level history ends with the death of the individual. On the nuclear level history will end with the ending of the universe. In between, history will end on the perception limits imposed by the observer.

Is the Cold War the end of history?

What we are witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, or a passing of a particular period of postwar history, but the end of history as such: that is, the end point of mankind’s ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.

Will the end of history be a sad time?

Fukuyama concludes that the end of history will be a sad time, because the potential of ideological struggles that people were prepared to risk their lives for has now been replaced with the prospect of “economic calculation, the endless solving of technical problems, environmental concerns and the satisfaction of sophisticated consumer demands.”