What happens if we did not exist?

Lacking human oversight, glitches in oil refineries and nuclear plants would go unchecked, likely resulting in massive fires, nuclear explosions and devastating nuclear fallout. “There’s going to be a gush of radiation if suddenly we disappear.

Who believes that nothing really exist?

Nihilism is the belief that all values are baseless and that nothing can be known or communicated. It is often associated with extreme pessimism and a radical skepticism that condemns existence. A true nihilist would believe in nothing, have no loyalties, and no purpose other than, perhaps, an impulse to destroy.

Why is there anything instead of nothing?

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Leibniz thought that the fact that there is something and not nothing requires an explanation. The explanation he gave was that God wanted to create a universe – the best one possible – which makes God the simple reason that there is something rather than nothing.

Did not exist or existed?

Both are correct… in their proper context. “Did not exist” means that the *item* did not exist in the past, but then began to exist. After it began to exist, it may have stopped existing, so it did not exist until it existed, but it may or may not exist now.

Do not exist or exists?

“Does not exist” speaks only to the present: the *item* does not currently exist; it might have existed in the past, but no longer exists, or it has never existed at all. Both sentences are correct. The first is in past tense and the second in present tense.

When to use exists vs exist?

“Exist” can be either the infinitive, as in “the universe began to exist,” or the present tense for all persons and numbers except third person singular, as in “I exist, you exist, we exist, they exist.” “Exists” is the third person singular present tense: “he exists, she exists, it exists.”

Why does nothing exist if nothing also exists?

Because nothing exists, nothing also does not exist. If you look at nothing as the opposite of something. The existence of one requires the existence of the other. But since one explicitly says it is nothing i.e. does not exist. That should also mean that something also does not exists.

Can the things that can be thought about exist?

For the things that can be thought about are the same as the things that canexist (“is for thinking” means “can be thought about”; “is for being” means “can exist”). Anything that canexist and can be thought about mustexist; for it can exist, and nothing (i.e., what does not exist) cannot exist.

What is the difference between “is” and “it is”?

“It is what?” is the appropriate response. But “is” in the existential sense means “exists,” and hence it is complete. “It is” means “it exists,” and this is a complete assertion. Another, more helpful, translation of this line reads: “That which is there to be spoken and thought of must be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umvcpPQJnBE