What is the difference between fundamentalism and modernism?

Fundamentalism emphasizes authority and fixed creeds in religion; modernism emphasizes freedom and progress in religious thought.

What are the characteristics of fundamentalism?

Characteristics of fundamentalism

• Religious texts are seen as perfect. As such, they might be read literally – be it the Bible, the Qur’an or the Torah.
• There is a profound rejection of modern society.
• Activism is strongly encouraged.
• Fundamentalism reinforces nationalism.
• Fundamentalists have a political agenda.

What is a fundamentalist religion?

Fundamentalist religion is where religious texts are taken entirely literally, and provide a strict set of rules which people should live by. Because such a view clashes with the norm in contemporary society (pluralistic, liberal, etc.) fundamentalist religion is also often highly political.

What is the difference between medieval and Modern Fundamentalism?

Whereas medieval religion was mysterious and often elitist, most contemporary fundamentalist movements are populist make use of technology and the methods of modern social movements to achieve their goals. If a growth in fundamentalism is a reaction to globalisation, it is also a reaction to secularisation. The two go hand in hand.

Does a fundamentalist need a church to interpret scripture?

The fundamentalists insists he needs no Church to interpret Scripture, for he contends that (a) Scripture is clear, or that (b) it interprets itself, or that (c) the Holy Spirit interprets it directly to him All three substitutes for the Church are easily shown to be inadequate: (a) Scripture is not clear, as it itself admits (2 Pet. 3:15-16).

What is the essential point of divergence between Catholicism and fundamentalism?

Thus, the Church is the essential point of divergence. In the fundamentalist view, the Catholic Church exalts itself over the Bible, adding to God’s Word: It is man arrogating to himself the right to speak in God’s name. But for Catholics, the fundamentalist puts the Bible in place of the Church as his “paper pope.”.