What is the problem with infinite regress?

Hence we form the habit of accepting explanations without much further examination. The fallacy of Infinite Regress occurs when this habit lulls us into accepting an explanation that turns out to be itterative, that is, the mechanism involved depends upon itself for its own explanation.

Why is infinite regress a fallacy?

It’s a fallacy because it is begging the question that is to say that it is a circular argument. Whether referring to the origins of the universe or any other regressive context, the answer simply moves the question back into infinite regress rather than answering it.

What is infinite regress in the Bible?

An infinite regress proposes an explanation, but the mechanism proposed stands just as much in need of explanation as the original fact to be explained. It is literally an infinite series of propositions where each proposition relies on the previous proposition.

Is it possible for finite being to love infinitely?

The simple answer is that love is not infinite–not in any meaningful way. No matter what axis you use as your measurement, no matter what perspective you look at it from, love is not infinite.

Can an infinite regress exist?

The mere existence of an infinite regress by itself is not a proof for anything. So in addition to connecting the theory to a recursive principle paired with a triggering condition, the argument has to show in which way the resulting regress is vicious.

What’s infinite love mean?

Limitless, eternal and becoming as one, there is no better symbol to represent eternal love. And it’s not just about eternal love but also the infinite and limitless possibilities that love brings. With so many possible way to interpret the infinity symbol, it is no wonder that it has become such a popular love symbol.

Is there an infinite being?

God is fashioned as an infinite being, i.e. one who’s abilities have no non-logical limitations. This definition, however, leaves us in an awkward epistemological position, as it ostensibly renders all potential evidence for such a being inherently ambiguous.

Is an infinite regress absurd?

For Aristotle, infinite regression presents as something absurd. Since there cannot be a cause that caused its self, we either accept vicious circularity or some being that is infinite in nature.