WHO said in pursuit of justice is it better that a guilty man go free or an innocent man be punished?

WHO said in pursuit of justice is it better that a guilty man go free or an innocent man be punished?

NUMBER: 953
AUTHOR: Benjamin Franklin (1706–90)
QUOTATION: That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved.

Who was Blackstone in criminal law?

Sir William Blackstone
Sir William Blackstone, (born July 10, 1723, London, England—died February 14, 1780, Wallingford, Oxfordshire), English jurist, whose Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vol. (1765–69), is the best-known description of the doctrines of English law.

Is it innocent until proven guilty?

A presumption of innocence means that any defendant in a criminal trial is assumed to be innocent until they have been proven guilty. As such, a prosecutor is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the crime if that person is to be convicted.

Is it better that 100 Guilty Men go free than 100 guilty?

Later than evolved to it being better that ten guilty men go free than one innocent man be convicted (William Blackstone: Blackstone’s ratio – Wikipedia ). More recently it has been said that it is better that a hundred guilty men go free than one guilty man be convicted (Ben Franklin: A Dictionary of Quotations. 1989 ).

READ ALSO:   How do you criticize English?

What is the moral of the law about 100 guilty may be free?

The moral of which is that, if the person’s guilt is just a little uncertain, it’s better to let a factually guilty person go than risk convincing an innocent one. Originally Answered: What is written in the law about 100 guilty may be free but one innocent should not be punished?

Is it better that 100 guilty persons escape than one innocent person?

That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, letter to Benjamin Vaughan, March 14, 1785.—

Is it worse to convict an innocent person than to acquit one?

It is presupposed that any ratio presented should not be taken to indicate that it is worse to convict an innocent person than to acquit a guilty one. An interpretation presented as more adequate is one from an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court case which stated, “it is better to let the crime of a guilty person go unpunished than to condemn the innocent.”

READ ALSO:   How do South Koreans feel about Korean War?