Why are US and NATO military forces in Afghanistan?

Why are US and NATO military forces in Afghanistan?

NATO Allies and partners went into Afghanistan after 9/11 to prevent the country from serving as a safe haven for international terrorists to attack us. Due to our military presence and the support of the international community, a new generation of men and women have grown up in a new Afghanistan.

What is NATO doing about Afghanistan?

The NATO-led mission Resolute Support Mission (RSM) in Afghanistan was launched on 1 January 2015, following the completion of the mission of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). Its aim was to provide further training, advice and assistance for the Afghan security forces and institutions.

READ ALSO:   Why does Coca-Cola sometimes taste different?

Is NATO helping Afghanistan?

Ministers also confirm that they will continue to fund the Afghan security forces until at least 2020. 27 April 2018: NATO foreign ministers reaffirm NATO’s commitment to the development of the Afghan security and defence forces through a conditions-based approach for the Resolute Support Mission.

What NATO means?

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
/ (ˈneɪtəʊ) / North Atlantic Treaty Organization, an international organization composed of the US, Canada, Britain, and a number of European countries: established by the North Atlantic Treaty (1949) for purposes of collective security.

Does an individual have a big moral responsibility to his fellow man?

Basically, leftists believe that an individual has a big moral responsibility to his fellow man, but upon closer inspection, one can see that this idea just doesn’t hold. To test this idea, we must first inspect what an obligation is in philosophical terms. An obligation is a duty that an individual must act on because they are morally bound to it.

READ ALSO:   How do you deal with a vindictive manager?

Is there a moral obligation to help the poor?

The Argument Against a Moral Obligation to Help the Poor On one hand, some argue that rich countries have no moral obligation to help poor countries.

Do we have a moral obligation to others?

Most of the time they just make up rights and obligations and use them as an excuse to label everyone who disagrees with them an evil person. So just like the fictional rights to healthcare and abortions that leftists have devised, the moral obligation we have to others does not exist. Luis Lopez is a contributor to The Liberty Conservative.

Do rich nations have an ethical obligation to help the poor?

The Argument For a Moral Obligation to Help the Poor On the other hand, philosopher Peter Singer argues that rich nations have an ethical obligation to help poor nations. [12] Peter Singer created an analogy to illustrate whys this ethical duty exists. Imagine that you were dressed in expensive clothes as you walked to class.

READ ALSO:   Where do you put leadership positions on LinkedIn?