What do I need to know before reading Kierkegaard?

What do I need to know before reading Kierkegaard?

Beginning to read Kierkegaard can be strange. His most regarded works are generally pseudonymous while he has a massive veronynous oeuvre as well. To get into this, I’d generally recommend starting with the pseudonymous works and going to the veronymous ones after and dependent on interests.

Is Kierkegaard a good writer?

He was born in 1813 and died in 1855, and did most of his writing in the 1840s and 50s. Now he’s often thought of as the father of existentialist thought, but he’s really much more than that. He did have a huge influence on twentieth-century philosophy, but his philosophy is very rich and complex.

How long does it take to read either or?

READ ALSO:   How do I talk to my child about drinking?

10 hours and 40 minutes
The average reader will spend 10 hours and 40 minutes reading this book at 250 WPM (words per minute).

Should I read Hegel before Kierkegaard?

Having some familiarity with what Kant and Hegel wrote will make the context of German Idealism clearer, but they aren’t absolutely required reading before starting Kierkegaard.

Who should I read before Kierkegaard?

Fear and Trembling is always a go-to for academics to get an introduction to Kierkegaard. It’s nice because it’s compact, is relatively straightforward, and has a lot of discussion around it which you can easily access online. Most folks, for better or worse, have exposure to K through this work.

Is Kierkegaard a nihilist?

Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) posited an early form of nihilism, which he referred to as leveling.

What is the point of either or Kierkegaard?

Either/Or, then, could be the poetic and literary expression of Kierkegaard’s decision between a life of sensual pleasure, as he had experienced in his youth, or a possibility of marriage and what social responsibilities marriage might or ought to entail.

READ ALSO:   Are polyamorous relationships difficult?

What should I read from Kierkegaard?

What is Kierkegaard most famous for?

In addition to being dubbed “the father of existentialism,” Kierkegaard is best known as a trenchant critic of Hegel and Hegelianism and for his invention or elaboration of a host of philosophical, psychological, literary and theological categories, including: anxiety, despair, melancholy, repetition, inwardness, irony …

What is the point of irony for Kierkegaard?

Irony confirms the elusiveness of Transcendence, its paradoxical nature. This irony takes on an ontological character, because by making the existence of the subject itself – an object, it also turns to existence: to the imperfection of existence and essence of human being, to whom the question of existence is given.

What is Kierkegaard’s philosophy on truth?

Answer Wiki. Kierkegaard, as an existentialist, argued against the objective truth. Just like any other existentialists, he emphasized the importance of subjectivity. What differentiates his philosophy from other existentialists is his view on Christianity.

READ ALSO:   Can only blind people read Braille?

How do I start reading Kierkegaard?

Beginning to read Kierkegaard can be strange. His most regarded works are generally pseudonymous while he has a massive veronynous oeuvre as well. To get into this, I’d generally recommend starting with the pseudonymous works and going to the veronymous ones after and dependent on interests.

What is considered Kierkegaard’s work by most people?

In general, if you just want to get a basic “What is considered ‘Kierkegaard’ by most people?” sense of his works, always begin with Fear and Trembling. It is his most popular work by far and with good reason–Sartre learned Danish seemingly just to read it despite him claiming it was to read Kierkegaard.

What made Kierkegaard an existentialist?

That total, irrational commitment made Kierkegaard an existentialist: one of the first, and most important. Kierkegaard, as an existentialist, argued against the objective truth. Just like any other existentialists, he emphasized the importance of subjectivity.