Which is better Puppet or Ansible?

Which is better Puppet or Ansible?

Many use Ansible for small, fast and/or temporary deployments, whereas Puppet is often used for more complex or longer-term deployments. If you have a mostly fixed set of machines to maintain, Puppet might be the better option, whereas if your machines are often being reprovisioned, Ansible might be the way to go.

Which is better Puppet or Chef?

To use an analogy, using Puppet is like writing configuration files whereas using Chef is like programming the control of your nodes. If you or your team have more experience with system administration, you may prefer Puppet. On the other hand, if most of you are developers, Chef might be a better fit.

Which is better Chef or Ansible?

The chef is older, has better documentation, and can handle difficult tasks. But, it is trickier to install as compared to Ansible. Chef’s Ruby DSL is preferred by developers and DevOps engineers. But, it has a steep learning curve as compared to Ansible, which uses simple YAML.

READ ALSO:   Is 30 fps in fortnite bad?

What is Puppet Chef Ansible used for?

Generally, Ansible, Puppet, SaltStack, and Chef are considered to be configuration management (CM) tools and were created to install and manage software on existing server instances (e.g., installation of packages, starting of services, installing scripts or config files on the instance).

What is the difference between chef Puppet and Ansible?

There are two types of configurations, such as push configuration and pull configuration. Ansible follows push configuration while Puppet and Chef follow the pull configurations. In the case of pull configuration, the slave nodes would pull all configurations from a central server without commands.

Can Ansible replace Puppet?

By virtue of these features no wonder that Ansible became blockbuster configuration management tool and many places it even replaced Puppet or other configuration management tool with more complex and comprehensive design.

Is Chef and Puppet same?

Chef and Puppet are both pioneers in the DevOps movement offering popular enterprise-grade configuration automation tools. Chef focuses on helping organizations to become fast and efficient and stay ahead of the competition by automating delivery and management of the entire IT stack.

READ ALSO:   Why is dielectric slab is placed in between the two plates of capacitor?

What is the difference between Ansible Chef and Puppet?

Chef – Chef Server works only on Linux/Unix but Chef Client and Workstation can be on windows as well. Puppet – Puppet Master works only on Linux/Unix but Puppet Agent also works on windows. Ansible – Ansible supports windows machines as well but the Ansible server has to be on Linux/Unix machine.

Is Ansible easier than chef?

Since Ansible uses YAML for its configuration language, it is much easier to manage than Chef. YAML is quite similar to English, making it an easier language for non-programmers to learn, and paving the way for easy management.

Is chef and Puppet same?

How Ansible is different from Chef & Puppet?

Chef – Chef uses Ruby Domain Specific Language (Ruby DSL). Puppet – Puppet uses its own puppet Domain Specific Language (Puppet DSL). It is not very easy to learn and its system administrator oriented. Ansible – Ansible uses YAML i.e Yet Another Markup Language (Python).

What is the difference between puppet and chef and Ansible?

As you can see above, puppet and chef are the old players whereas Ansible and saltstack are new players, and Ansible looks very promising with the growing trend. So, to conclude, all the four tools have their own advantages and categories in which they are better than the other.

READ ALSO:   What were the causes of the war in Afghanistan?

Which DevOps tool should you choose between chef or Ansible?

When it comes to ease of setup and installation, Ansible dominates the other two tools as it has ‘agentless’ architecture. Chef and Puppet follow master-agent or master-slave architecture. The management of the DevOps tools depends upon the language and configuration of the tools. There are two types of configurations including ‘pull’ and ‘push’.

What is Ansible configuration tool?

Ansible, Puppet, and Chef are configuration tools. Michael DeHaan developed ansible in 2012. It is an orchestration tool. Ansible creates consistent environments.

What is the difference between Chef vs puppet vs Chef?

Chef has an Agent Based Architecture while Puppet has both of them. If Agent Based Architecure is used, then an Agent exist at the remote amanged end. Another important difference is about the mechanism used by these Automation systems.If we check Ansible vs Puppet vs Chef, Ansible uses Push mechanism while Chef and Puppet use Pull mechanism.